Supreme Administrative Court: UODO competence requires examination
The judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court (NSA) of 1 September 2026 demonstrates that an assessment of a GDPR infringement cannot precede a determination of whether the President of the Personal Data Protection Office was competent to issue the decision in the case. The full text of the judgment in our database shows that the omission of that issue prevented the NSA from conducting a substantive review of the case.
The rest of this analysis, all theses and the full text of the ruling are available with an AKTUALNOŚCI PLUS subscription.
Find out how EU supervisory authorities, administrative and civil courts and the CJEU reason their decisions — and keep your organisation aligned with current case law.